United States v. Dimetriace Eva-Lavon John

597 F.3d 263 (2010)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Dimetriace Eva-Lavon John

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
597 F.3d 263 (2010)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Dimetriace Eva-Lavon John (defendant) was an account manager at Citigroup. John had access to customer information contained in Citigroup’s computer system. John provided her half-brother with information pertaining to corporate customer accounts, enabling her half-brother to incur fraudulent charges on customer accounts. Citigroup’s official policies, reiterated in training programs that John attended, prohibited misuse of the company’s internal computer systems and confidential customer information. John was convicted of exceeding authorized access to a protected computer in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). On appeal, John argued that the statute prohibited using authorized access to obtain information she was not entitled to obtain or to alter information she was not entitled to alter but did not prohibit the unlawful use of information she was authorized to access through authorized use of a computer.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Owen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership