United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.

627 F.2d 736, 10 ELR 20935 (1980)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
627 F.2d 736, 10 ELR 20935 (1980)

Facts

Section 1321(f)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) stated that dischargers of oil or hazardous substances would be liable to the government for cleanup costs, notwithstanding any other provision of law. The section also provided that the government could recover above the FWPCA’s liability limits if the spill involved the discharger’s willful negligence or misconduct. In 1974, a tugboat operated by Dixie Carriers, Inc. (Dixie) (defendant) lost control of some tanker barges. One barge struck a bridge near New Orleans, spilling more than a million gallons of oil into the Mississippi River. Under the FWPCA, Dixie’s maximum liability for cleanup costs was $100 per ton of the barge’s weight, amounting to $121,000. Dixie discontinued its cleanup efforts after it had expended $121,000. The United States government (plaintiff) paid over $950,000 to clean up the remaining oil. The government sued Dixie to recover its cleanup costs, bringing claims based on public nuisance, negligence, and the Refuse Act. Dixie argued that the FWPCA provided an exclusive and comprehensive remedy for oil spills, barring the government from recovering additional amounts under the Refuse Act or common law. Dixie moved for partial summary judgment. The government argued that the FWPCA neither expressly superseded common-law claims nor repealed the Refuse Act. The trial judge granted partial summary judgment for Dixie but allowed an interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thornberry, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership