United States v. Doig

950 F.2d 411 (1991)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Doig

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
950 F.2d 411 (1991)

Facts

Patrick Doig (defendant) worked as a tunnel-project manager for the S. A. Healy Company (Healy) in Milwaukee. A tunnel explosion killed three Healy employees. Both Healy and Doig were charged for violating the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970 (OSHA) under a provision that imposes criminal liability for violations leading to the death of an employee. The government (plaintiff) argued that Doig aided and abetted Healy in violating OSHA regulations regarding electric-power shutoff during gas encounters and the use of explosion-proof equipment. Doig moved to dismiss the charges against him, arguing that as an employee, not an employer, he could not be held criminally liable under OSHA as either a principal or an aider and abettor. The district court granted the motion to dismiss, and the government appealed the order of dismissal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership