Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Dorman

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
860 F.3d 675 (2017)


The federal government (plaintiff) charged Harold A. Dorman (defendant) with unlawful gun possession in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), possession with intent to distribute phencyclidine (PCP), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, and possessing a gun during a drug-trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The trial evidence established that police investigating a jewelry store robbery searched a house owned by Dorman's mother and frequented by many individuals. Dorman usually slept in the house's basement bedroom, and had done so the night before the robbery, but the house was not Dorman's only residence. Dorman was not present when the police entered the house. Upstairs in the living room, the police found a handgun and a one-ounce vial of PCP. Both items were concealed from plain view. Downstairs, the police found a bottle containing more than 15 ounces of PCP next to the laundry-room washing machine, where a passerby might not notice it. The police noticed a handle protruding from the bed in Dorman's bedroom, and found a pistol wedged under the mattress. On the basement steps, hidden under a blanket, the police found a trash bag containing empty vials that could be used for packaging PCP. The police found no direct evidence of the jewelry store robbery. Additional trial evidence connected Dorman to the PCP, but it was equivocal or contradicted by other evidence. The jury convicted Dorman on all charges, and he appealed to the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals. After affirming Dorman's convictions on the gun-possession charge, the court turned its attention to the two drug-related charges.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial