United States v. Dotson
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
799 F.2d 189 (1986)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Frederick Dotson (defendant) was charged with receiving firearms as a felon. Dotson defended himself on the ground that he was repeatedly threatened after his original release from prison, necessitating his possession of firearms. To this end, Dotson testified and called witnesses describing how and why Dotson received the firearms. To combat Dotson’s necessity defense, the prosecution (plaintiff) called government agents to testify about the truthfulness of Dotson and his witnesses. Cumulatively, the prosecution’s witnesses opined that Dotson and his witnesses did not have good characters for truthfulness. Largely, these opinions were based on the agents’ investigation of Dotson. The agents did not provide a further basis for their opinions. Dotson was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that the government witnesses’ opinion testimony should not have been permitted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
