United States v. Dowdell
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
595 F.3d 50 (2010)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Law-enforcement investigator Joao Monteiro purchased crack cocaine from Darryl Dowdell (defendant). Monteiro noted that Dowdell was wearing a blue-checkered shirt at the time of the sale. A few hours later, Dowdell was arrested on an unrelated charge. Dowdell’s booking photo showed him wearing a blue-checkered shirt. Monteiro identified the man in the booking photo as the one who had sold him crack cocaine several hours earlier. At trial, Dowdell claimed that Monteiro’s identification was incorrect and that Dowdell was not the person who had sold drugs to Monteiro. To corroborate Monteiro’s trial identification of Dowdell, the booking sheet was introduced into evidence under the public-records exception for hearsay. The booking sheet contained both the photo of Dowdell in the blue-checkered shirt and a textual description that Dowdell had been wearing a blue plaid shirt when he was booked, both of which matched Monteiro’s description of the man who had sold drugs to him. Dowdell was convicted and appealed. On appeal, Dowdell claimed that the booking sheet should have been excluded because it was a police report and police reports are not admissible under the hearsay exception for public records.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Howard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.