Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

United States v. Dukes

432 F. 3d 910 (2006)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

United States v. Dukes

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

432 F. 3d 910 (2006)

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Drexel Lee Dukes, Jr. (defendant) on drug-manufacturing charges and for possessing firearm silencers, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). That tax-law statute makes it a crime to possess a "restricted" firearm, as defined by 26 U.S.C. § 5845, without registering it in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record. Section 5845's definition of firearm includes some types of gun, such as sawed-off shotguns and machine guns, as well as items other than guns, such as silencers and bombs. The trial evidence established that Dukes lived with his girlfriend, Pamela Hoselton, at her house. Eyewitnesses to a drive-by shooting told the police that they saw someone speed away from the scene in a car they recognized as Hoselton's. A police search of Hoselton's house turned up the controlled substance methamphetamine, equipment for making methamphetamine, several guns, and two devices that they suspected were homemade silencers fashioned from modified industrial mufflers. The modifications rendered the mufflers unfit for their intended use on pneumatic air valves. Dukes admitted possessing the devices but claimed he was ignorant of the devices' use for "silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm." The jury convicted Dukes on all counts. On appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, Dukes challenged the sufficiency of the government's evidence on the § 5861(d) charge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gruender, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership