From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
United States v. Duran Samaniego
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
345 F.3d 1280 (2003)
Roberto Duran Samaniego (Duran) (defendant) was a world-champion boxer. Duran claimed that his championship belts were stolen by his brother-in-law, Bolivar Iglesias. The belts were recovered when Luis Gonzalez Baez (defendant) attempted to sell the belts to federal agents. Baez claimed that the belts were not stolen. The United States government (plaintiff) filed an interpleader action to determine the rightful owner of the belts. Duran sought to have Iglesias testify at trial, but Iglesias was a Panamanian national and lived in Panama. Despite the help of Iglesias’s immediate family members, Duran could not locate Iglesias and thus could not get Iglesias to travel to the United States and testify. Instead, Duran sought to introduce the testimony of Iglesias’s family members stating that Iglesias had apologized to them for stealing the belts. The district court admitted this testimony over Baez’s objection, under the state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule. As a result, the district court did not reach the issue of whether Iglesias’s apology was admissible as a statement against interest. The jury found that Duran was the rightful owner of the belts. Baez appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Carnes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.