United States v. Easy Health Care Corporation

Case No. 1:23-cv-3107 (2023)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Easy Health Care Corporation

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Case No. 1:23-cv-3107 (2023)

SC

Facts

[Editor’s Note: This brief summarizes an excerpt from a complaint that the United States government brought against Easy Health Care Corporation in federal district court.] The United States government (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Easy Health Care Corporation (Easy Health) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaint alleged that Easy Health violated § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act and the FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule. In the complaint, the government specifically alleged the following. Easy Care developed an app called the Premom Ovulation Tracker (Premom) by which users could track their personal health information, including information and data about their ovulation cycles. Premom permitted and even encouraged users to import health information from other apps, including the Apple Health app. Easy Care’s privacy policy stated that it would not share users’ health information with third parties absent consent. Despite this, Easy Care shared users’ health information with Google, LLC, and AppsFlyer Inc. In addition, Easy Care shared users’ health information with analytics companies Jiguang and Umeng. Easy Care’s agreements with Jiguang and Umeng permitted the companies to use Premom users’ information in a variety of ways, including for advertising. Easy Care failed to take reasonable care with respect to the security risks of these companies. This failure constituted an unfair business practice. Easy Care did not inform its users of any of these disclosures to third parties. Easy Care’s representation that it would not share users’ health information with third parties without consent was false and misleading. Given Easy Care’s privacy policy and sharing of its users’ highly sensitive health information to third parties without consent and without reasonable care regarding the third parties’ security risks, Easy Care engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices in violation of § 5 of the FTC Act and the FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership