United States v. Eaton
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
784 F.3d 298 (2015)
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted county sheriff Christopher Eaton (defendant) on two counts of witness tampering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3). That statute prohibited tampering with the reporting of a federal offense. The trial evidence established that Eaton and several of his deputies severely beat Billy Randall Stinnett, whom they had just arrested and handcuffed after a high-speed chase. The excessive use of force against a handcuffed prisoner was a federal offense. News of the incident eventually reached the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which launched an investigation and ordered Eaton and his deputies to prepare reports of what happened before, during, and after Stinnett's arrest. Deputies Adam Minor and Steve Runyon testified that Eaton forced them to report, falsely, that Stinnett had resisted arrest and pulled a knife on Eaton. Eaton reviewed both reports and added embellishing details to Minor's report before sending the reports to the FBI. Eaton subsequently used his power over Minor and Runyon to try, unsuccessfully, to prevent them from later changing their stories. The jury convicted Eaton on both counts, and he appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Eaton contended that the testimony of two admitted perjurers, who over time changed their accounts of the Stinnett incident, could not support the jury's convictions. Eaton also contended that, because the false incident reports related to Stinnett's conduct before his arrest, and the federal offense under FBI investigation took place only after Stinnett was handcuffed, any false statements in the deputies' reports did not materially relate to the commission of a federal offense.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clay, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.