United States v. Edwards

235 F.3d 1173 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Edwards

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
235 F.3d 1173 (2000)

SC

Facts

Carbeania Grimes called the police and told them that Troy Edwards (defendant), her boyfriend, had assaulted her. When the police arrived, they saw Edwards driving a car outside of the home and arrested him. The car did not belong to Edwards, but officers found several papers in the car that belonged to Edwards. The officers neglected to inventory the papers. Officers also found a black bag inside the car that contained crack cocaine. Edwards was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Edwards claimed that the black bag was not his, and there was initially no evidence tending to prove that it was. After the bag was introduced into evidence at trial, the bag was taken to the U.S. Attorney’s office, which was a violation of local court rules. That night, the prosecution (plaintiff) examined the bag and removed a cardboard bottom from the bag. Under the cardboard, the prosecutor allegedly found a crumpled bail receipt with Edwards’s name on it. The receipt had not been discovered during the police’s initial search of the bag. The district court introduced the receipt into evidence over Edwards’s objection. Edwards was convicted, and he appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed on grounds unrelated to the admission of the receipt. At Edwards’s second trial, Edwards again filed a motion to exclude the receipt. The district court denied the motion, and Edwards was convicted. He appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership