United States v. Edwards
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
235 F.3d 1173 (2000)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Carbeania Grimes called the police and told them that Troy Edwards (defendant), her boyfriend, had assaulted her. When the police arrived, they saw Edwards driving a car outside of the home and arrested him. The car did not belong to Edwards, but officers found several papers in the car that belonged to Edwards. The officers neglected to inventory the papers. Officers also found a black bag inside the car that contained crack cocaine. Edwards was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Edwards claimed that the black bag was not his, and there was initially no evidence tending to prove that it was. After the bag was introduced into evidence at trial, the bag was taken to the U.S. Attorney’s office, which was a violation of local court rules. That night, the prosecution (plaintiff) examined the bag and removed a cardboard bottom from the bag. Under the cardboard, the prosecutor allegedly found a crumpled bail receipt with Edwards’s name on it. The receipt had not been discovered during the police’s initial search of the bag. The district court introduced the receipt into evidence over Edwards’s objection. Edwards was convicted, and he appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed on grounds unrelated to the admission of the receipt. At Edwards’s second trial, Edwards again filed a motion to exclude the receipt. The district court denied the motion, and Edwards was convicted. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.