United States v. Edwards

46 M.J. 41 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Edwards

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
46 M.J. 41 (1997)

Facts

Aviation Boatswain’s Mate Glen Edwards (defendant) received nonjudicial punishment for an unauthorized absence and for carrying a concealed weapon. Edwards received this punishment while attached to the U.S.S. Constellation, which was dry-docked for an overhaul. During the nonjudicial-punishment proceedings, Edwards was not given a Booker warning, i.e., a notice that he had a right to confer with counsel about demanding a court-martial instead of a nonjudicial punishment. Later, Edwards faced a special court-martial for six additional unauthorized absences. After Edwards was convicted, the prosecution (plaintiff) offered evidence of the prior nonjudicial punishment from the U.S.S. Constellation to request a more severe sentence for the court-martial conviction. Edwards objected, arguing that evidence of the prior nonjudicial punishment was inadmissible because he had not received a Booker warning during the prior proceedings. The judge ruled that even though the U.S.S. Constellation had not been operational, Edwards had been attached to a vessel. Thus, Edwards had not been entitled to receive a Booker warning, and the prior-punishment evidence was admissible. Edwards appealed the evidentiary ruling. The Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the admissibility of the nonjudicial-punishment evidence, and Edwards appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gierke, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Sullivan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership