United States District Court for the District of Columbia
376 F. Supp. 29 (1974)
Five federal agents (defendants) broke into Dr. Lewis Fielding’s (plaintiff) office to obtain medical records of a patient, Daniel Ellsberg, who was under federal indictment for revealing top-secret information at the time. The agents did not have a warrant and were later indicted for conspiring to violate Dr. Fielding’s Fourth Amendment rights. Before the trial began, the defendants moved for permission to gain discovery of national security information in order to establish that there was presidential authorization for their actions or, in the alternative, that enough national security information was available to the defendants at the time that allowed them to form a good-faith, reasonable belief that the break-in was both valid and in the interests of national security. The agents also moved for dismissal of the case based on the danger of exposing national security information.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gesell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.