United States v. Eiland
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
738 F. 3d 338 (2013)
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Gerald Eiland and Frederick Miller (defendants) for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848, and for other crimes they allegedly committed as drug-trafficking kingpins. The elements of the CCE offense were: (1) the commission of a narcotics-related felony, (2) as part of continuing series of violations, (3) in concert with five or more persons, (4) for whom the defendant acted as an organizer or supervisor, and (5) from which the defendant derived substantial income or resources. As to Miller, the trial evidence established that he organized Tyrone and Timothy Thomas's interstate transportation of drug-purchase money and cocaine and directed the pair's location and recovery of a lost cocaine shipment. Miller ordered Charles Brown to assist the Thomases in recovering the cocaine. On a few occasions, Miller also gave Darius Ames drug money and directed Ames's movements as Eiland's "gofer." A federal agent testified that Miller's cousin, Jay Ingram, acted as a lieutenant in the Eiland-Miller operation and obtained the drug PCP from Miller. Federal agents also intercepted a phone call from Eiland to Miller, in which Eiland asked Miller about Ingram's whereabouts and Miller responded that Ingram was with him. Agents once observed a meeting between Eiland, Miller, and Ingram outside a takeout restaurant. The jury convicted Miller on all the CCE counts relating to the Thomases, Brown, and Ames. The jury acquitted Miller on the Ingram PCP count, but nevertheless found Miller guilty of supervising Ingram's drug-related activities. Miller appealed to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 711,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 711,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.