United States v. Eric B.

86 F. 3d 869 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Eric B.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
86 F. 3d 869 (1996)

RW

Facts

The United States government (plaintiff) charged Eric B. (defendant), a twelve-year-old boy, with committing an act of delinquency, namely second-degree murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111. The trial evidence established that a friend gave Eric a gun in school. Eric knew the gun was loaded with two bullets. After school, Eric pointed the gun at a schoolmate, but then turned away and fired one shot at a rock. Eric deftly removed the remaining bullet and pocketed it. Several times that afternoon, Eric pointed the unloaded gun at other schoolmates and pulled the trigger. Eric reloaded the gun with the remaining bullet and offered it to a girl, suggesting that she use it to shoot her friend, but she refused the offer. Next, Eric pointed the loaded gun at an 11-year-old boy and pulled the trigger, but the gun did not fire. Finally, Eric aimed the gun at Nathan Crank, a seven-year-old boy. Eric squeezed the trigger and the gun went off, shooting Nathan in the head and killing him. The trial judge found Eric not guilty of murder, but guilty of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1112. Eric's lawyer appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, contending that the government failed to prove that Eric knew the gun was loaded when he shot Nathan, that due to Eric's age and intelligence level he did not fully understand the threat to others that his actions created, and that consequently the fatal shooting was an accident and not manslaughter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Real, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership