United States v. Evans
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
728 F.3d 953 (2013)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Joseph Anderson Evans Sr. (defendant) was charged with several crimes relating to his immigration status. In his defense, Evans claimed he was a US citizen and attempted to admit into evidence an Idaho birth certificate. During a pretrial hearing on whether the birth certificate was admissible, the government presented three witnesses who testified that the birth certificate was not substantively genuine, but there was no dispute that the birth certificate was an official document issued by the Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics. The trial court found the government’s witnesses to be credible. The court held that no reasonable person could conclude the birth certificate was substantively genuine, and it was thus inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 104. Evans was convicted, and he appealed the conviction on the grounds that the court improperly excluded his birth certificate.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Paez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.