United States v. Evans

728 F.3d 953 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Evans

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
728 F.3d 953 (2013)

Facts

Joseph Anderson Evans Sr. (defendant) was charged with several crimes relating to his immigration status. In his defense, Evans claimed he was a US citizen and attempted to admit into evidence an Idaho birth certificate. During a pretrial hearing on whether the birth certificate was admissible, the government presented three witnesses who testified that the birth certificate was not substantively genuine, but there was no dispute that the birth certificate was an official document issued by the Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics. The trial court found the government’s witnesses to be credible. The court held that no reasonable person could conclude the birth certificate was substantively genuine, and it was thus inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 104. Evans was convicted, and he appealed the conviction on the grounds that the court improperly excluded his birth certificate.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Paez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership