United States v. Ex-U.S.S. Cabot/Dedalo
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
179 F. Supp. 2d 697 (2000)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The ex-U.S.S. Cabot/Dedalo (Cabot) (defendant) was a decommissioned navy aircraft carrier. For a time, a museum in Louisiana owned the Cabot and displayed it at a wharf near New Orleans. Another ship collided with the Cabot, and the Cabot became at risk of breaking free of the wharf, potentially resulting in the Cabot’s destruction. When the museum declined to protect the Cabot, the United States Coast Guard (plaintiff) voluntarily intervened. The Coast Guard spent over $500,000 to repair and transport the Cabot to a safe docking facility. Later, Pankaj Patel acquired the Cabot. Patel engaged Marine Salvage & Services, Inc. (Marine Salvage) (plaintiff) to temporarily hold the Cabot at a wharf in Texas. While the Cabot was wharfed, it began to lean to one side, indicating that it was in danger of capsizing. Capsizing would have destroyed all of the Cabot’s economic value. William Kennon, Marine Salvage’s president, could not obtain clear instructions from Patel about what Patel wanted Kennon to do to protect the Cabot. Kennon voluntarily chose to spend approximately $20,000 to stabilize the Cabot despite the endeavor being beyond Marine Salvage’s contractual obligations. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas seized the Cabot and held a forced sale generating $185,000. The court then conducted proceedings to determine how the sale proceeds would be distributed to various claimholders, including the United States and Marine Salvage.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tagle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.