United States v. F/V Taiyo Maru, Number 28

395 F. Supp. 413 (1975)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. F/V Taiyo Maru, Number 28

United States District Court for the District of Maine
395 F. Supp. 413 (1975)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

In September 1974, the United States Coast Guard found the Taiyo Maru 28 (defendant), a Japanese fishing vessel, fishing without authorization within the United States’ (plaintiff) contiguous fisheries zone. The Coast Guard pursued the Taiyo Maru beyond the contiguous zone and seized the Taiyo Maru on the high seas. The high seas are international waters. The United States filed suit in district court against the Taiyo Maru and its owner, arguing that the Taiyo Maru was subject to condemnation and forfeiture because it had violated United States federal law by fishing within the United States’ contiguous zone. The Taiyo Maru countered and moved to dismiss, arguing that (1) pursuant to the Geneva Convention on the High Seas, the United States was not authorized to pursue the Taiyo Maru beyond the contiguous zone and seize it on the high seas; and (2) although the United States was authorized to establish a contiguous zone in which it could enforce certain federal laws, federal fishery laws could not be enforced in contiguous zones.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gignoux, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership