United States v. Farinella
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
558 F.3d 695 (2009)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Charles Farinella (defendant) bought 1.6 million bottles of Henri’s Salad Dressing. The bottles had labels stating “best when purchased by” with dates between January to June 2003. The dates had been picked by the manufacturer. Farinella bought the salad dressing when close to the best-when-purchased-by dates, changed the label dates to 2004, and sold the bottles to discount food stores. Farinella was arrested and convicted of selling misbranded food with the intent to defraud or mislead. Farinella appealed, arguing that he could not be convicted for misbranding food under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act merely by changing the best-when-purchased-by date.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.