United States v. Farner

251 F.3d 510 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Farner

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
251 F.3d 510 (2001)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Robert Farner met a supposedly 14-year-old girl online and kept in contact with her for three months through instant messaging, email, and telephone calls. Farner attempted to persuade the girl to have sexual relations with him and sent her four pornographic pictures. Farner arranged to meet the girl to engage in sexual activity. When Farner arrived at the designated meeting spot, he was arrested by an adult Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agent who had posed as the underage girl as part of a sting operation. Farner was indicted for attempting to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce a minor into engaging in sexual activity. The district court denied Farner’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, finding that Farner had believed the FBI agent to be a minor and acted on that belief. Farner argued on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion because his defense was not factual impossibility but legal impossibility: the minor was actually an adult, and therefore it was legally impossible for him to commit the charged crime of attempting to induce a minor to engage in sexual activity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kazen, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership