United States v. Feldman
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
761 F.2d 380 (1985)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
First Guaranty Metals (FGM) invested funds in precious metal futures before filing for bankruptcy. The next day, FBI agents searched FGM’s offices, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a complaint alleging FGM defrauded customers due to its salesmen’s misrepresentations. The CFTC sought to disgorge FGM’s profits and deposed three of its former executives: president Herbert Sandburg, who left FGM five months beforehand, and Richard Feldman and Richard Martenson (defendants), both top-tier managers. All three received notices of the depositions, but Feldman and Martenson did not attend or have attorneys represent them at Sandburg’s deposition. One day beforehand, Sandburg agreed to cooperate with the government and testify against Feldman and Martenson in exchange for not being targeted in criminal proceedings. The government did not disclose Sandburg’s agreement until just before Feldman and Martenson’s criminal trial almost a year later. Meanwhile, the government knew Sandburg was terminally ill, and he died less than a month after his deposition. When the government indicted Feldman and Martenson for fraud, the district court admitted Sandburg’s deposition as the centerpiece of the prosecution. Both were convicted and appealed, arguing that admitting the deposition violated their right to cross-examine witnesses against them.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wisdom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.