United States v. Fifty-Three Eclectus Parrots
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
685 F.2d 1131 (1982)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Allen (defendant) was a bird trader. Through an importer, Allen bought 56 eclectus parrots originally from Indonesia and imported them into the United States. Indonesia prohibited the export of eclectus parrots. Allen did not know of the Indonesian law, or of 19 U.S.C. § 1527, which prohibits the import of any wild bird if exporting the bird is prohibited in the country of origin. United States customs seized the parrots and ordered their forfeiture. The United States government successfully moved summary judgment. Allen appealed, arguing that the parrots were not “wild” within the meaning of § 1527. The government argued that a bird was “wild” under the statute if it was normally found in a wild state, which eclectus parrots were.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Canby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.