Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Flores-Villar

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
536 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2008)


Facts

Ruben Flores-Villar (defendant) was born in Mexico to a U.S. citizen father and a non-U.S. citizen mother. Flores-Villar’s father was 16 years old at the time of his birth. Flores-Villar moved with his father to the United States when Flores-Villar was two months old. When he was 22 years old, Flores-Villar was deported. Subsequently, Flores-Villar was charged with being a deported alien found in the United States after deportation. Flores-Villar defended himself on the ground that he was a U.S. citizen. However, Flores-Villar was not a U.S. citizen on account of a federal statute providing that an American father who had a child out of wedlock abroad with a non-citizen mother must have lived in the United States for at least five years after his fourteenth birthday in order to pass his American citizenship to the child. The same law provided that an American mother who had a child out of wedlock abroad with a non-citizen father was only required to live in the United States for a period of one year in order to pass her American citizenship to the child. Flores-Villar argued that this law violated his right to equal protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The federal government argued that the law furthered the governmental interests of avoiding the statelessness of a child in such a situation and of ensuring a strong link between the child and the American father and the United States as a country. The district court found that the statute was constitutional and convicted Flores-Villar. Flores-Villar appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rymer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.