United States v. Ford

839 F.3d 94 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Ford

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
839 F.3d 94 (2016)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) successfully prosecuted James F. Ford (defendant) on various charges related to his operation of a sophisticated industrial-grade marijuana-growing operation in Maine. Ford had previously pleaded guilty to running a similar operation in Massachusetts. In sentencing Ford, the judge noted that several states had recently legalized the medicinal and recreational use of marijuana. Nevertheless, the judge sentenced Ford to 120 months' imprisonment, in accordance with the mandatory minimum penalty provided by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(vii). Ford appealed his convictions and his sentence to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. Ford argued that, in light of the public's evolving acceptance of marijuana use, and the federal government's general policy of not prosecuting marijuana cultivation and distribution in states that legalized marijuana use, his sentence was grossly disproportionate to his offense, and therefore violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mastroianni, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership