United States v. Fountain

768 F.2d 790 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Fountain

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
768 F.2d 790 (1985)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

The maximum-security cell block at Marion federal penitentiary housed two masters of prison murder: Clayton Fountain and Thomas Silverstein (defendants). Each had already killed three people. Three guards escorted Fountain and Silverstein separately in handcuffs whenever either left his cell. The guards were unarmed; otherwise, the escorted prisoner might seize their weapons. As guards escorted Silverstein, he stopped in front of the cell of Randy Gometz (defendant) and stuck his hands inside. Gometz released the handcuffs and then raised his shirt, revealing a homemade shank. Silverstein grabbed the shank and repeatedly stabbed one of the guards, Clutts, killing him. Immediately afterward, Silverstein said the killing was personal revenge because Clutts had disrespected him. Gometz was convicted of aiding and abetting Silverstein. Gometz appealed, arguing the evidence did not prove he knew what Silverstein would do with the shank. [Ed.’s note: The casebook excerpt addresses only Gometz’s appeal, omitting Silverstein and Fountain’s consolidated appeals.]

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership