Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Freeman

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
357 F.2d 606 (1966)


Facts

Charles Freeman (defendant) had a long history of drug and alcohol abuse. In 1963, Freeman sold heroin to undercover police officers. Freeman was arrested and charged. Freeman was determined competent to stand trial, but he argued he lacked capacity to be found guilty for his actions. The district court applied the M’Naghten test for incapacity, which requires that a party suffer from a mental disease or defect that makes him incapable of knowing the nature and quality of his actions or that those actions were wrongful to avoid liability. Freeman’s expert psychiatric witness indicated that Freeman had suffered bouts of toxic psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, convulsions, amnesia, and brain traumas related to his drug use and prize fighting. Nevertheless, the expert conceded that Freeman was aware that he was selling heroin, but did not know it was wrong. The government presented expert psychiatric testimony that even though Freeman’s drug use had dulled his thinking, he could still, with limitations, tell right from wrong. The district judge concluded that Freeman’s incapacity did not rise to the level required to satisfy the M’Naghten test and found him guilty. Freeman appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.