United States v. General Dynamics
United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 239 (1987)
General Dynamics Corporation (General Dynamics) (plaintiff), an accrual-basis taxpayer, was legally obligated to pay for medical services received by its employees and their dependents. However, many employees did not file a claim to obtain reimbursement until after the end of the tax year. In 1972, General Dynamics estimated the amount of payments that would eventually be made for medical services received by its employees in the current tax year. General Dynamics then established a reserve fund large enough to cover the estimated payments, and deducted this amount from its gross income for the tax year. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) disallowed General Dynamics’ tax deduction. General Dynamics petitioned the federal claims court for a tax refund from the United States government (defendant). The claims court granted the refund petition because General Dynamics had incurred liability for the payment of medical services in the current tax year. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.