From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
United States v. Gerber
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
999 F.2d 1112 (1993)
General Electric owned a piece of land in Indiana that included an ancient Indian burial mound containing many artifacts. During construction of a highway on the land, workers uncovered the burial mound. The workers alerted Bill Way, also one of the workers on the project, to the existence of the artifacts. Way, a collector of Indian artifacts, bulldozed into the burial mound and discovered hundreds of artifacts. He removed many artifacts and took them home that day. Way was introduced to Arthur Gerber (defendant) through an acquaintance because Gerber was a well-known collector of Indian artifacts. In exchange for the artifacts Way had removed and guidance to the burial mound, Gerber paid Way $6,000. Making several trips to the site, Gerber removed hundreds of artifacts. Eventually, Gerber was spotted by a security guard and ejected from the site. Soon after, Gerber sold some of the artifacts from the burial mound in Kentucky. Gerber admitted to accessing the burial mound and removing the artifacts without permission and that he had violated Indiana state law by committing criminal trespass at the site and by conversion of the artifacts. He also admitted to transporting the artifacts in interstate commerce. Gerber pleaded guilty to violations of the § 470ee(c) of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (the act), but he preserved his right to appeal the applicability of § 470ee(c) to his conduct. Gerber appealed and argued that § 470ee(c) applied only to violations of state and local laws that were on federal or Indian lands or that it applied only to state and local laws that expressly protected archaeological objects.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.