From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Gillock
United States Supreme Court
445 U.S. 360 (1980)
Facts
Edgar H. Gillock (defendant) was a Tennessee state senator. In 1976 Gillock was charged with violating several federal laws by accepting money to use his public office to block the extradition of a criminal defendant from Tennessee to Illinois and to introduce legislation that would allow four people to obtain occupational licenses for which they otherwise would have been ineligible. Gillock moved to suppress evidence related to his legislative acts. The district court granted Gillock’s motion and held that as a state senator, Gillock had an evidentiary privilege under Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence because common-law principles supported finding such a privilege. The district court came to its conclusion by analyzing the Speech or Debate Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants a similar privilege to members of Congress. The district court explained that the privilege was necessary to protect the independence of state legislators and ensure the integrity of the legislative process. After determining that Gillock had an evidentiary privilege available to him, the district court prohibited evidence related to Gillock’s legislative acts and motions from being introduced in court. The federal government (plaintiff) appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the district court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
