United States v. Gilmore

372 U.S. 39 (1963)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Gilmore

United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 39 (1963)

Play video

Facts

Mr. Gilmore (plaintiff) owned a franchised automobile dealership. In a divorce litigation, Gilmore’s wife claimed a community-property share of Gilmore’s dealership property. The state supreme court granted the divorce but rejected the wife’s property claim. If the wife had won her claim, Gilmore might have lost his franchise and the income it produced. Under § 212 of the federal tax code, Gilmore deducted the legal costs incurred in defending his property. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that all of Gilmore’s legal expenses were personal in nature. As a result, the commissioner denied Gilmore’s § 212 deduction and assessed back taxes. Gilmore paid the assessment and then sued for a refund in the United States Court of Claims, which ruled in Gilmore’s favor. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 778,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership