United States v. Goldberg

491 F.3d 668 (2007)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Goldberg

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
491 F.3d 668 (2007)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Jeremy Goldberg (defendant), a 23-year-old convicted drug offender, downloaded and shared hundreds of sadistic, hardcore child-pornography images on a peer-to-peer network. Some of the images involved children as young as two. The federal government (plaintiff) charged Goldberg with knowing possession of child pornography. The federal sentencing guidelines range for Goldberg’s offense was 63 to 78 months. There was no statutory mandatory minimum sentence. The federal government requested a sentence enhancement based on the sadistic nature of some of the images. The district court deviated from the guidelines and imposed a sentence of one day in prison followed by 10 years of supervised release, during which time Goldberg would be required to undergo psychological treatment for his pedophilia. The district court stated that sentencing Goldberg to substantial prison time would ruin his life and that a lengthy supervised release would allow the court to monitor Goldberg while simultaneously allowing Goldberg to pursue his education, obtain a job, and get access to more extensive psychological services than those available in prison. The federal government appealed the sentence, arguing that it was an abuse of the court’s discretion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership