United States v. Gomez
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
763 F.3d 845 (2014)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
During an investigation of a cocaine drug ring, federal agents were attempting to identify a distributor known as Guero. A wiretap traced calls from Guero to the address of Nicolas Gomez (defendant). Gomez was charged for distribution in federal court. At trial, Gomez claimed that the true identity of Guero was his brother-in-law who lived at the same residence. In response, the government (plaintiff) introduced evidence that a small amount of cocaine was found in Gomez’s bedroom at the time of his arrest. The court admitted the evidence over Gomez’s objections, and Gomez was convicted. Gomez appealed, arguing that the court erred by admitting improper other-act evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)(1).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.