United States v. Gomez-Norena
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
908 F.2d 497 (1990)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Jaime Leon Gomez-Norena (defendant) was arrested at the Los Angeles International Airport after agents discovered two kilograms of cocaine in his bag. He was charged under federal law for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) sought to elicit testimony from a customs agent, Inspector Espinoza. The testimony included statements made by Espinoza to other agents that Gomez-Norena fit the drug-courier profile. During this testimony, the defense counsel objected twice, once on hearsay grounds and once on improper-character-evidence grounds. The trial-court judge overruled both objections but instructed the jury to consider the testimony about the drug-courier profile as background material to convey the events of that day and not as evidence of the Gomez-Norena’s guilt. On appeal, Gomez-Norena claimed that Espinoza’s testimony should have been excluded at trial based on the separate objection that it was unfairly prejudicial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.