United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez

548 U.S. 140, 126 S.Ct. 2557, 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez

United States Supreme Court
548 U.S. 140, 126 S.Ct. 2557, 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006)

Play video

Facts

Gonzalez-Lopez (Lopez) (defendant) was charged with conspiracy to distribute marijuana. His family hired an attorney named John Fahle to represent him. Lopez later hired another attorney, Joseph Low, to represent him and told Fahl that he wanted Low to be his only attorney. Low filed for admission pro hac vice but the court denied his request. Low filed for admission a second time and was again denied without comment. Another attorney, Dickhaus, represented Lopez at trial. Dickhaus requested that Low be allowed to sit at counsel’s table. The court denied this request and ordered Low not to have contact with Dickhaus during the trial. Lopez was found guilty. Lopez appealed. The appellate court reversed Lopez’s conviction and held that the denial of Low’s requests for admission violated Lopez’s right to paid counsel of his choice guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. The court held that the violation of Lopez’s Sixth Amendment right was not subject to harmless error analysis. The United States (plaintiff) appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

Dissent (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Criminal Procedure

Key Terms