United States Supreme Court
457 U.S. 368 (1982)
Goodwin (defendant) was charged by the United States government (plaintiff) with several misdemeanor and petty offenses after striking a federal park officer with his vehicle and fleeing after a traffic stop. Plea negotiations took place with a Department of Justice attorney, but Goodwin demanded a jury trial in district court. An assistant U.S. attorney took over the prosecution in district court and added a felony charge for assaulting a federal officer. A jury convicted Goodwin of the felony and one misdemeanor count. Goodwin moved to have the verdict set aside due to prosecutorial vindictiveness, alleging that the felony charge had been added as retaliation for Goodwin’s jury-trial demand. The district court denied the motion, finding that the prosecutor had no retaliatory intent. The court of appeals reversed, holding that although there was no actual vindictiveness, there existed a presumption of vindictiveness in the absence of evidence that the felony could not have been brought prior to the jury-trial demand. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.