United States v. Google LLC

687 F. Supp. 3d 48 (2023)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Google LLC

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
687 F. Supp. 3d 48 (2023)

SC

Facts

Google LLC (defendant) had a series of contracts with web-browser developers like Apple and Mozilla and wireless companies like Samsung and Verizon. The contracts enabled Google to be the default search engine on various products. The United States and various state attorneys general (collectively, the governments) (plaintiffs) sued Google for violation of the Sherman Act. The governments alleged that Google held monopolies in four markets: (1) general search services, (2) general search text advertising, (3) search advertising, and (4) general search advertising. The governments requested that the court in its analysis aggregate all anticompetitive effects of Google’s conduct, even certain conduct that did not, on its own, have any anticompetitive effects. Google argued that its conduct must be reviewed individually and filed a motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mehta, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership