United States v. Google LLC
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM), Case No. 20-cv-3715 (APM) (D.D.C. Aug. 5, 2024)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Google LLC (defendant) developed a search engine that became extremely lucrative, generating billions of dollars from advertisers seeking to place digital ads alongside search results. Google’s search engine dominated over other options. By 2020, nearly 90 percent of all searches in the United States, and 95 percent of searches on mobile devices, went through Google. In contrast, the next largest search engine, Microsoft’s Bing, processed only 6 percent of searches. Google’s market dominance was attributable in part to Google’s significant, ongoing investment in innovation and its shrewd business decisions, particularly regarding the early development of a search platform for mobile devices. However, Google had another market advantage, namely, exclusive-distribution contracts with browser developers, mobile-device manufacturers, and wireless carriers (collectively, developers). Under the agreements, developers agreed to preload Google as the only default search engine on their products. In exchange, Google paid the developers revenue shares, meaning a percentage of the ad revenue generated from queries run through the preloaded search engines. The payments to developers totaled over $26 billion in 2021. The United States (plaintiff) filed an antitrust suit against Google, alleging that Google was violating Sherman Act § 2 by engaging in improper conduct to maintain monopoly power.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mehta, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.