United States v. Gordon
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
526 F.2d 406 (1975)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Joseph Gordon (defendant) was charged with possessing and selling amphetamines. At trial, he asserted the defense of duress. Specifically, Gordon claimed someone threatened to kill him and his friends unless he sold the drugs, so he believed their lives were in danger. But someone hundreds of miles away made the threats during long-distance phone calls. The trial court concluded the threats lacked the immediacy necessary for duress and convicted. Gordon appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Solomon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

