United States v. Gotti

459 F.3d 296 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Gotti

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
459 F.3d 296 (2006)

Facts

Peter Gotti, Richard Gotti, Anthony Ciccone, and Richard Bondi (defendants) were all members or associates of the Gambino Family, an organized-crime family based in New York City. Peter, Richard, Ciccone, and Bondi were among a number of Gambino Family members and associates who were charged in a 68-count indictment based on extortion, corruption, and other illicit activities conducted as part of the family’s organized-crime operations. The extortion schemes allegedly included actions against labor unions, health plans, union members, business owners, and actor Steven Seagal. The mobsters were eventually convicted of numerous counts of extortion under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. The mobsters appealed, alleging that the recent Supreme Court decision in Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 537 U.S. 393 (2003) (Scheidler II), had held that the Hobbs Act did not apply to intangible property, and therefore the decision invalidated the extortion convictions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Katzmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership