United States v. Gourde

440 F.3d 1065 (2006)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Gourde

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
440 F.3d 1065 (2006)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Micah Gourde (plaintiff) had a paid membership to Lolitagurls.com, a website offering a mix of adult and child pornography images for viewing and download. The website header clearly stated it offered explicit images of girls aged 12 to 17. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) shut down the website following an investigation and collected, but did not review, the website’s image download log. Lancelot Security, the credit card payment processor that handled membership payments for Lolitagurls.com, provided the FBI with a list of all paid subscribers, including full names, home addresses, and email addresses. Gourde was listed as an active paid subscriber. Based on Gourde’s active membership with Lolitagurls.com, the FBI applied for a warrant to search Gourde’s computer. In the warrant application, the FBI stated that (1) collectors of child pornography frequently hoard images on their computers; (2) images downloaded on computers can be recovered even after deletion; (3) Gourde’s Lolitagurls.com membership indicated he was likely a collector of child pornography; and (4) Gourde’s membership gave him viewing and download access to hundreds of child-pornography images. The magistrate issued the search warrant. The FBI seized Gourde’s computer and found over 100 child-pornography images on it. The federal government (defendant) charged Gourde with possession of child pornography. Gourde moved to suppress the evidence found on his computer, arguing the search warrant was issued without probable cause. The district court denied Gourde’s motion, holding that, based on a totality of the circumstances, Gourde’s membership account with a child-pornography website established probable cause that Gourde possessed child pornography. Gourde appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKeown, J.)

Dissent (Kleinfeld, J.)

Dissent (Reinhardt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership