United States v. Green

745 F.2d 1205 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Green

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
745 F.2d 1205 (1984)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

John Green (defendant) was the quality assurance director of Con-Chem, Inc., a chemical coatings manufacturer. Con-Chem sought to contract with a power company to provide coatings for an area of a nuclear power plant that housed the plant’s reactor and cooling system. To qualify for use in that area, coatings had to pass safety-related tests required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Con-Chem began a testing program of its coatings. When it appeared that Con-Chem’s coatings would not qualify, Green falsified the test report and sent it to the power company. He also sent photographs that purported to be testing samples but were actually samples that had not been tested. Green was indicted and convicted for filing a false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. On appeal, he argued that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to instruct the jury on jurisdictional knowledge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Skopil, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership