United States District Court for the District of Oregon
2010 WL 331772
Virginia Ruth Hadlock (defendant) owned several single-family homes that she rented to various individuals. However, after an investigation conducted by the Fair Housing Council of Oregon (FHCO) it was learned that Hadlock had a long-standing practice of refusing to rent to families with children. Hadlock repeatedly told prospective renters that she did not want children in her homes. The FHCO filed a motion with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) alleging that Hadlock engaged in discrimination against families with children. The U.S. (plaintiff) filed suit against Hadlock for violations of the Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHA), and the Oregon Fair Housing Act. The FHCO intervened as a plaintiff in the action (collectively Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment in federal district court alleging that there were no issues of fact regarding Hadlock’s violation of the FHA, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a) and (c).
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clarke, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.