United States v. Haile
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
685 F. 3d 1211 (2012)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The federal government (plaintiff) obtained the convictions of Randy Vana Haile and Mark Anthony Beckford (defendants) on several counts relating to drug and firearm offenses. Count 6 charged Beckford with possession of a firearm bearing an obliterated serial number, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(k). On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed each of Haile's and Beckford's other convictions before considering Beckford's appeal of his conviction on Count 6. As to that count, the trial evidence established that federal agents arrested Beckford when he drove his truck to a prearranged location to trade cash and guns for drugs. Beckford had set up the exchange with a "dealer" who turned out to be working undercover for the government. The agents found cash, a handgun, a machine gun, two rifles, and ammunition in Beckford's truck. Because these items were stashed in the back of the truck and therefore out of Beckford's reach, the government could not establish actual possession, but the evidence was sufficient to show that Beckford had constructive possession of the items. The serial number on one of the rifles had been obliterated. There was no direct evidence that Beckford had actual knowledge of the obliteration. However, the government asserted that the jury could infer Beckford's knowledge from the ample opportunity he had to discover the obliteration. The government offered no proof as to how long Beckford had the rifle in his constructive possession.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.