United States v. Hambrick
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
55 F. Supp. 2d 504 (1999)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Detective J. L. McLaughlin was an officer with the Keene, New Hampshire, Police Department. McLaughlin entered an online chatroom and began communicating with someone who was using the screenname Blowuinva. Based on these conversations, McLaughlin determined that Blowuinva was trying to lure a 14-year-old boy to live with him. McLaughlin obtained a subpoena and served it on Blowuinva’s internet service provider (ISP), MindSpring, seeking all information related to Blowuinva’s internet protocol (IP) address. In response, MindSpring gave the name, address, phone numbers, and other personal information of Scott Hambrick (defendant) to McLaughlin. MindSpring also confirmed that Hambrick’s MindSpring account was on the internet at Blowuinva’s IP address. Ultimately, the government acknowledged that the subpoena was invalid, because the justice of the peace who signed it did not have the issue before him and was McLaughlin’s colleague at the Keene Police Department. Hambrick, relying on the Fourth Amendment, filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained from MindSpring pursuant to the subpoena.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Michael, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.