Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Haney

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
287 F.3d 1266 (2002)


Facts

Francis escaped from prison, and after he escaped, “America’s Most Wanted” wrongly described Francis as a member of the Aryan Brotherhood, a white-supremacist group. Racial tensions were sparked at the penitentiary where Francis was housed after he was re-captured and Francis believed that his only option was to escape from the penitentiary before he was severely hurt. Francis sought the help of Haney (defendant) to escape from the penitentiary again. Haney helped to gather different objects to aid in the escape, but on the night of the proposed escape, convinced Francis that it would be best to get caught trying to escape in order to be separated from the rest of the prisoners. Francis agreed and left the escape objects across the prison yard until he was caught by prison officials and taken into custody. Haney and Francis were both charged with possession of escape objects in prison and of attempted escape. At Francis’s trial, the jury was instructed on a duress defense, but this duress defense was denied at Haney’s trial. Haney was convicted of attempted escape and appealed his conviction, claiming that, like Francis, he was entitled to a duress defense.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Henry, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 205,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.