United States v. Hansl
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
439 F.3d 850 (2006)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
John Hansl (defendant) was born in Yugoslavia to an ethnic German family. After Germany invaded Yugoslavia, one male from each ethnic German family was ordered to serve the Nazi cause. Hansl was conscripted and assigned to the SS Death’s Head Guard Battalion at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp. Hansl guarded prisoners from watch towers, marched prisoners at gunpoint to and from forced-labor sites, gave orders to prisoners, was armed, and had orders to shoot anyone who tried to escape. Hansl was transferred to a supply depot, was a guard in another concentration camp and on a train transport, and served in a combat unit. Hansl was wounded, hospitalized in German hospitals, and captured. After being investigated for possible war crimes, Hansl was transferred to a prisoner-of-war facility and went to an Austrian refugee camp upon release. Hansl applied for and was granted a United States visa and was naturalized in 1961. Section 14(a) of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953 (RRA) provided that a visa was not to be issued under the act to anyone who personally advocated or assisted in the persecution of any person or group because of race, religion, or national origin. The United States charged Hansl with illegal procurement of naturalization. The district court found that Hansl’s conduct during the war constituted personal assistance in persecution, making him ineligible for a visa under the RRA; granted the United States summary judgment; and revoked Hansl’s citizenship. On appeal, Hansl argued that the district court erred in failing to consider (1) immigration officials’ testimony as to what constituted “personal assistance” and State Department policies that made Hansl admissible under the RRA, (2) legislative history regarding the meaning of “personally assisted,” and (3) the involuntariness of Hansl’s service.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Melloy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.