United States v. Hansl

439 F.3d 850 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Hansl

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
439 F.3d 850 (2006)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

John Hansl (defendant) was born in Yugoslavia to an ethnic German family. After Germany invaded Yugoslavia, one male from each ethnic German family was ordered to serve the Nazi cause. Hansl was conscripted and assigned to the SS Death’s Head Guard Battalion at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp. Hansl guarded prisoners from watch towers, marched prisoners at gunpoint to and from forced-labor sites, gave orders to prisoners, was armed, and had orders to shoot anyone who tried to escape. Hansl was transferred to a supply depot, was a guard in another concentration camp and on a train transport, and served in a combat unit. Hansl was wounded, hospitalized in German hospitals, and captured. After being investigated for possible war crimes, Hansl was transferred to a prisoner-of-war facility and went to an Austrian refugee camp upon release. Hansl applied for and was granted a United States visa and was naturalized in 1961. Section 14(a) of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953 (RRA) provided that a visa was not to be issued under the act to anyone who personally advocated or assisted in the persecution of any person or group because of race, religion, or national origin. The United States charged Hansl with illegal procurement of naturalization. The district court found that Hansl’s conduct during the war constituted personal assistance in persecution, making him ineligible for a visa under the RRA; granted the United States summary judgment; and revoked Hansl’s citizenship. On appeal, Hansl argued that the district court erred in failing to consider (1) immigration officials’ testimony as to what constituted “personal assistance” and State Department policies that made Hansl admissible under the RRA, (2) legislative history regarding the meaning of “personally assisted,” and (3) the involuntariness of Hansl’s service.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Melloy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership