United States v. Harman

66 M.J. 710 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Harman

United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals
66 M.J. 710 (2008)

Facts

Sabrina D. Harman (defendant), an army reservist assigned as a guard at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, was convicted of several offenses including dereliction of duty in violation of Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) due to her willful failure protect detainees from abuse, cruelty, and maltreatment. The conviction arose from two incidents that occurred in November 2003. On November 4, a detainee was forced to stand for an hour on a box with an empty sandbag covering his head. Harman attached wires to the detainee’s hands and told him that he would be electrocuted if he fell off the box. On November 7, Harman took photos as other guards forced a group of hooded, handcuffed detainees to sit or lie in a pile on the floor and physically assaulted them. The detainees were then stripped, and Harman wrote “I’m a rapeist (sic)” on the naked thigh of one detainee. The naked detainees were then forced to form a human pyramid. Harman posed for a photo in which she stood next to the pyramid, smiling and giving the thumbs-up symbol. Prior to the November incidents, Harman, on one occasion, removed the handcuffs from a prisoner who had been handcuffed for multiple hours by another guard and reported the incident to the appropriate authority. On another occasion, Harman wrote a letter to her former roommate expressing concern about mistreatment of prisoners she had witnessed. The convening authority approved Harman’s conviction, and her case was forwarded to the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals for review pursuant to Article 66 of the UCMJ. On appeal, Harman argued that the evidence was insufficient to sustain her conviction because it did not show that she knew or reasonably should have known of her duty to protect the detainees. In support of this argument, Harman asserted that she was not adequately trained as a prison guard or educated in the law of armed conflict. Harman also argued that she was not derelict in her duty because she had been working to expose the abuse by documenting it in photographs.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Maggs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership