United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 612 (1954)
Tom Linder, the commissioner of agriculture for the State of Georgia; Ralph Moore, a trader of commodity futures; and Robert Harriss, a commodity broker (defendants), were directors of the National Farm Committee (NFC) (defendant). Each of the defendants was indicted for violating the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act (FRLA), 2 U.S.C. §§ 261-70. Harriss was indicted for failing to report expenditures of his own money to influence legislation, while Linder and Moore were indicted for seeking to influence Congress for pay without registering with Congress. NFC was indicted for failing to report the solicitation and receipt of contributions to influence the enactment of legislation. The trial court dismissed the indictments, finding that the FRLA was unconstitutional as enacted. The federal government appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C.J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.