Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Harvey

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
746 F.3d 87 (2014)


Facts

In 2011, the federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Godfrey Emmanuel Harvey (defendant), a Jamaican, for re-entering the United States after having been deported for an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). A conviction required not only proof that a court ordered Harvey's deportation, but that the order had actually been carried out. The trial evidence established that a judge ordered Harvey's deportation in 1991, and that immigration officer David R. Thompson executed a signed warrant indicating that, on March 7, 1992, he witnessed Harvey leave the country on a flight bound for Jamaica. The warrant listed the flight number. Harvey stipulated that the warrant bore his fingerprints and signature and the flight number. Thompson died before Harvey's 2011 trial. However, immigration agent William Sansone testified that, in 1992, deportation procedure required Thompson to escort Harvey to the aircraft, ensure the cabin was secure, remain at the cabin door until the aircraft pulled away from the boarding gate, and then watch the aircraft until it flew out of sight. Harvey moved to dismiss the case for lack of evidence, arguing that the government did not introduce any evidence that Harvey had ever actually left the country, or that Thompson followed the 1992 deportation procedure. The federal district court judge denied Harvey's motion, ruling that there was no particular reason to doubt that Thompson followed procedure. The jury convicted Harvey, and he appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial