United States v. Hassoun
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
2007 WL 4180844 (2007)
- Written by Caroline Milne, JD
Facts
Adham Amin Hassoun, Jose Padilla, and Kifah Wael Jayyousi (defendants) were convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 956(a)(1) of conspiring to commit murder, kidnapping, or maiming outside of the United States while committing overt acts in furtherance of the crime within the United States. The government claimed that the defendants sent aid—including money, recruits, and equipment—overseas for use in violent jihadist conflicts. The government presented evidence that Hassoun used coded language to hide illegal activities undertaken on behalf of jihad, Padilla attended an al Qaeda training camp overseas, and Jayyousi funded recruits for jihad. The defendants claimed that they never intended to commit any of the three objectives—murder, kidnapping, or maiming—of the conspiracy, but only meant to send humanitarian aid overseas. A jury convicted the defendants of conspiracy under § 956(a)(1). The defendants filed motions for acquittal, arguing that the evidence presented at trial did not prove their intent to murder, kidnap, or maim a person overseas while the defendants were in the United States.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cooke, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.